IPENZ Engineering Heritage Jobhunt Foundation

    Contact us | Join | Calendar | Search 


   

New Zealand Engineering 1998 October

Profession Lines Up Behind New Act
After four years of consultation and analysis the Engineers Registration Board is about to tell the Ministry of Commerce, that "yes", engineers do believe there is merit in maintaining an official register of engineers in New Zealand. The issue first arose when the Minister of Commerce wrote to the ERB in 1994 asking it to consider whether the Engineers Registration Act (1924) should be replaced or done away with altogether. Determining a response has taken some time but chair Jenny Culliford is now sure that the ERB can clearly say on behalf of all engineers and the community that retaining some form of government registration is broadly regarded as desirable.

The ERB has consulted widely, seeking views from registered engineers, IPENZ,ACENZ, ALGENZ and the Consumers' Institute. It has looked at the experiences of the Medical Council and the Society of Chartered Accountants.
The ERB report will be among a number of submissions, including one from IPENZ, which are now being forwarded to the Minister of Commerce. The Ministry of Commerce has developed guidelines which have been approved by Cabinet on a policy framework for occupational regulation. Ministry officials will be reporting to the Minister by the 1 December on the necessity for a registration regime. The ERB and other reports received by the Minister will provide input to the Ministry review which will use the approved policy framework for analysis purposes.

"We now have a uniform voice on the substantive issues although there is still some detail which will need to be considered later," Mrs Culliford says.

The principal rationale for recommending a register at all is that engineering failure impacts heavily on the health and safety of communities. While it is possible to operate a system purely in terms of the outputs of engineering practice this exposes communities to undue risk. By operating a system of identifying engineers who have met a certain set of minimum standards the community, through Government, is given an additional level of protection at the input side of engineering.

IPENZ President Gretchen Kivell says consumers are looking to Government to provide accountability for health, wealth and safety issues raised by professional practices.

The general agreement is that a register will have to be a considerably tighter arrangement than the one currently operated. The ERB believes registration certificates should reflect a knowledge of relevant New Zealand codes and that engineers need to demonstrate ongoing competence to maintain their registered status. The ERB also believes that an ethical code and discipline system should have statutory backing so that it would have more "teeth".


"Registration is an international trade issue"
- Warwick Bishop, IPENZ CEO


"We now have a uniform voice on the substantive issues"
- Jenny Culliford ERB Chair


"Consumers looking to government"
- Gretchen Kivell, IPENZ President


IPENZ chief executive Warwick Bishop says that internationally our trading partners expect to see some form of Government-backed registration of engineering. Without such a register New Zealand engineers could be placed at a significant competitive disadvantage in an export industry already bigger than the wine trade. IPENZ qualifications manager Virginia Burton points out that Australia, without a central register, has 560 separate pieces of legislation referring to the qualifications of engineers and a single Act would be much tidier.

Another point in favour of a register comes from Beca Carter executive chairman and Deputy President of IPENZ Sir Ron Carter. Sir Ron points out that under the Companies Act boards of directors are expected to show prudence in approving technical decisions. By having a state register of technical expertise boards would be able to ensure that they had had work designed or checked by a person of legally recognised competence.

In general the IPENZ position is closely aligned to that of the ERB. IPENZ was keen to have a protected title (eg. Chartered Engineer) included but the ERB has not pushed this aspect as far. Aside from that IPENZ sees the Society of Chartered Accountants Act 1996 as a useful model for new legislation.


Blank space Blank space Blank space Blank space